This  sermon  has nothing to do  with falling asleep under your pastor’s  sermons – just in case you wanted to know in
advance!  J 
In Acts 20 Paul is on his third and last missionary journey,
having spent almost three years in Ephesus, a strategic city in Asia minor. His
letter to the Ephesians is so very helpful in terms of understanding the nature
and power and also the application of the gospel. 
In  Ephesus  Paul 
first preached the gospel for three
months in the local synagogue (19:8),
after  which  he left there 
to preach  the gospel daily
in the hall of Tyrannus for  two years
… so that all the residents of Asia heard
the word of the Lord, both Jews and Greeks (19:9,10). What an astonishing statement! 
We saw that the preaching of the gospel bore fruit and we saw
that it produced resistance, both in the synagogue and in the city. I often
marvel that the preaching of the Gospel (i.e. Good News) is very often not received as such,
but rather in a hostile manner. I had such an experience recently when
preaching the gospel at a funeral of a man with no church connections. I don’t
think that the congregation  expected to hear a gospel message, and when it came, the
faces froze. Apart from the fact that I could have been more thoughtful and more
mindful and  more  prayerful for the grieving people that sat before  me,  I had
to remind myself  that  the gospel does not   enter heads
and hearts naturally. Man’s sinful
nature opposes the gospel, since the gospel demands that man must lay down
his claim to autonomy,  and that the gospel demands  a man  to confess his sin
and  that the gospel demands that a man must  return to his Creator. 
I needed to remind myself that while the preacher
can prepare well, only the Holy Spirit can make a person love the gospel of
Jesus. Only the Holy Spirit knows who the true sheep of Christ are, and even
though it is the work of the church to participate in the finding of the
lost sheep of Jesus, we do not know who they are, until we see it in the fruit
of true conversion. 
We use the means given to us. We pray for the harvest, and
we preach for a verdict. We present the gospel message on every occasion, in
formal settings like Paul in the synagogue and in the hall of Tyrannus, but
mostly in informal settings. And since God has granted a people to hear and
believe the gospel in every generation, we, like the apostle Paul  must  expectantly
use daily opportunities to proclaim the
gospel.  But we must also be ever prepared
for resistance from the beasts of Ephesus (1
Cor.15:32  cf. 2 Cor. 1:8)  
And so, seeing that the work was done (Acts 19:10) and following a severe 
upset and riot in Ephesus, Paul leaves 
here, crossing the Aegan sea, entering into Macedonia, and down to
Greece, and  probably to Corinth. 
We
remember that Paul had a difficult relationship with the church at Corinth (e.g.
see the painful letter in  I Corinthians 5:9-10 and the  mentioning  of   the painful visit in 2 Cor. 2:1).  He spent three months there, and  again he hears of a plot  against him by the Jews (20:3). Instead of sailing back to Syria,  he changes plans
and  goes back up to Macedonia, and  again across the Aegan  sea and  then to Troas, accompanied by
the  7 people mentioned in  20:4
plus  Luke[1],
the  writer of the book of Acts. They
stayed in Troas for 7 days.
V.7 “On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break
bread….”
The Christian church maintained the practice of keeping the 7th
day of public worship, but now on a Sunday, from the reckoning of the Jewish
calendar, the first day of the week. The practice of gathering on the 7th
day with the breaking of bread was begun in Acts 2:42 along with the preaching of the Word of God. He doesn't mention all the  activities of Acts
2:42ff here, but we may assume with fair certainty that fellowship and prayer
were part of the meeting.  
Concerning the breaking of bread we can say this. From  1 Corinthians  11:17-34
 we know that the breaking of bread was  done in the context  of a fellowship meal , a supper- akin to the
Passover meal – but it was really a ‘perfected Passover’, since the true Lamb
of God was slain. In the context of  an
evening  meal  the  gathered church  would 
take some time out to  remember  and celebrate what became known as  ‘the
Lord's Supper’.  The Lord’s supper
does not only anticipates all that Jesus accomplished in His death and resurrection, but it also   anticipates 
that great feast,  the marriage
supper of the Lamb (Rev. 19:7 cf. Matt.
22:2)  when all  God’s elect people, the sheep of Jesus  Christ shall finally be gathered  at that
great  wedding  feast  in the presence of our great King Jesus, forevermore. 
But before that  fellowship meal happens, Paul has  much to say. He knows that he may not be back
for a long time … if ever.  And so he takes
time to pour out that which the Lord has laid on his heart for the church in
Troas. I wished that we had a record of what he said, but we can safely assume,
that all that he said has been written in the Bible.  He   has
a very long list of things to say, and so “he
prolonged his speech (Gr. dielegeto)
until midnight.”  
In this context we find the story of Eutychus, a young man,
sitting on the window sill of the upper room of a three story house. And as ’Paul talked still longer’ he ‘sank into a deep sleep‘ (20:9). In this case it is deadly. He
falls out of the window ‘and was taken up
dead’.  In a manner  reminiscent of Elisha  who  was used of God to raise from the dead  the 
young son of a widow (2 Ki. 4:18-37),
“Paul 
went down and bent over him, and taking him in his arms, said, ‘ Do not
be alarmed, for his life is in him’”. The same is reported of the ministry
of Peter who by the power of God raised Tabitha/ Dorcas from the dead (Acts 9:36-43).
Luke records  that  this  young man 
was picked up dead (20:9). Luke, the writer of the 'Acts',  being a physician  was surely  qualified to say this.   Some  commentators [2]
say that  he wasn't really dead following the fall. He was
merely unconscious and when Paul said,   “his
life (psuchē)  is in him”, they think that he is simply saying, ‘Praise God…he wasn’t really dead….this is lucky fellow survived this fall from a three story building’.
There is no reason not to believe that this young man was
dead. Paul was  after  all an apostle attested with
miracles (see 19:11), and  this 
happening at midnight  would have
served  further authenticate the gospel
that Paul was preaching, and it  created
a buzz and  it certainly gave the
Christian community in Troas the impetus to 
stay awake  until daybreak,
and  the youth being alive, we are told, brought  not a little comfort to the community  (20:12)
[Please note that the breaking
of bread, or the Lord’s supper  (20:11) happened only after the incident
at midnight. ]
So why do we find this
remarkable story here?  
What did the Holy Spirit intend
to achieve by having this recorded?  
What
do we learn from this? 
·      
Is
the point of this message that preachers should not ''kill their  people''  through preaching  long sermons?
·      
Is
this story  proof  that 
some people would rather die than listen to  long sermons?
·      
Or
is this  story  a warning to preachers that,  unless   you  have the gift of raising the dead, keep your  people   from 
window sills and awake at all costs?
The answer is, ‘None of the above!’ My sermon title  is actually 
deceptive, but I did that intentionally to show you what  preachers  can do with 
such texts, and you need to be awake 
enough  so that when that
happens.   
So then, what is the point of the passage?  
It surely is a demonstration and
authentication of kingdom power, and  specifically 
of  resurrection  power. This text, I would argue,    is a
repeat of John 11- the raising of Lazarus from the dead. That story was
recorded by the Holy Spirit to show us that  the Jesus whom Paul preached  is  the One  who has the power over life and death. He is the resurrection and the life [Jn.
11:25]. 
I would not be surprised  if Paul,
following the  miraculous raising  of Eutychus, followed by the breaking of
bread,  spoke  until daylight about  the work of Jesus  in the context of  man's  sin  and  the curse of 
death, and about the resurrection of the body,  and the life to come. When I read Paul’s
letters I certainly  see him 
addressing  these subjects again
and again.  Surely he must have used this
incident as a powerful illustration to that end.  
We also take note of the fact that this incident came in
the middle of the night, at midnight,  the darkest, most vulnerable  time 
when we are just  not in control
of ourselves. Paul and Silas  in
Acts  16 had another midnight  experience in which they  were in prison, having been severely beaten in
Philippi, but their hearts were in God’s hands,  and at midnight they  were praying and singing  hymns to God …. And suddenly there was the
deliverance… at midnight!  
David says in  Psalm 18:4-6,  expressing the same thought : 
“The cords of death 
encompassed me;
The torrents of destruction assailed me; 
 The cords of
Sheol entangled me; 
The snares of death confronted  me.
In   my distress I called upon the LORD
To my God I cried for help.
From his temple 
he heard my voice, 
and  my cry to
him reached his ears. 
We are  not a little comforted   when
we read passages like this. 
[1]
Timothy from Lystra; Aristarchus and Secundus from Thessalonica in Macedonia;
Tychicus comes from Asia; Sopater comes from Berea; Trophimus from Ephesus;
Gaius  from Derbe;  Luke from Antioch. Notice the ‘we’  in 20:6
as Luke includes himself again in the narrative .
[2] E.g.
William Barclay thinks so  in his commentary upon the passage 

 



 
 
